Consumer watchdog urged to step in on so-called ocean plastic – Australia

Posted on April 17, 2023 by DrRossH in Plastic Recycling

Source

Brands such as Glad say they use ocean or ocean-bound plastic, but they could be using plastic collected from areas up to 50 kilometres from the sea.

Take Glad’s recycled bin liners. In bold capitals, the label boasts they are “50% OCEAN PLASTIC”.

A little lower on the label, in a less prominent spot, “OCEAN PLASTIC” becomes “50% Ocean Bound Plastic*”.

The block capitals vanish. An asterisk appears.

In fine print, on the back of the roll, it says “OCEAN PLASTIC” and “Ocean Bound Plastic*” may never have been in the ocean at all.

In fact, it could have been plucked from the landscape in developing countries, up to 50 kilometres away from the sea.

“Made using 50 per cent ocean-bound recycled plastic that is collected from communities with no formal waste-management system within 50 kilometres of the shoreline,” the explanatory note reads.

It’s the kind of devil-in-the detail approach that has clean-up campaigner Heidi Tait hot under the collar, and imploring the consumer watchdog and politicians to act.

Tait founded the Tangaroa Blue Foundation, which works to prevent, remove and track marine debris in Australia. She recently told a government inquiry consumers are being taken for a ride, taking aim at a growing class of products that say they’re made from 50 to 100 per cent ocean or ocean-bound plastic.

“We’re allowing frameworks that have [overseas] waste pickers that might go and pick up rubbish 50 kilometres from the coast that may never have entered into the ocean,” she told the inquiry.

“We are importing that waste as a feedstock to be manufactured into [new] products and then we are claiming that somehow we’ve cleaned up the ocean and it’s going to have a benefit to our marine environment and to our wildlife.

“Those things are all extremely misleading.”

Couldn’t agree more with Ms Tait.   This is very misleading to consumers.