It’s time for bioplastics to be plastics
Posted on March 10, 2017 by DrRossH in Plastic Waste News“I wish people would stop calling PLA* a bioplastic…” said Steve Davies, director of public affairs and communications at NatureWorks during a recent meeting of the Sustainable Packaging Coalition’s Industry Leadership Committee on Bioplastics. “…and start thinking of it as one more functional material—dare I say it…another plastic.”
Source: It’s time for bioplastics to be plastics | Packaging Digest
The world of bioplastics has exploded, and there is an amazing breadth of materials that can be classified as bioplastics. Part of the reason, arguably, is the far-reaching definition of a bioplastic. The most commonly used definition, popularized by European Bioplastics, is that a bioplastic is bio-based, biodegradable or both. To unpack this, that means that a bioplastic can be inherently non-biodegradable. It means that a bioplastic can contain 0% bio-based materials. A bioplastic may be 100% fossil-based. It can be any combination of being partially bio-based, fully bio-based, non-bio-based, biodegradable, compostable or non-biodegradable, so long as it is not both non-bio-based and non-biodegradable.
There are four basic permutations of these characteristics, and bioplastics encompass three of them:
It is correct that the world of Bioplastics has become very confusing and the word is often used to the sellers advantage rather that what the buyer thinks he is getting.
Discussion · No Comments
There are no responses to "It’s time for bioplastics to be plastics". Comments are closed for this post.Oops! Sorry, comments are closed at this time. Please try again later.